Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
