Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
