Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
