Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
