Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
