Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX stands out for a weight of 285g / 10,05oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
