Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
