Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
