Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster
