Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
