Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
