Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
