Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
