Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
