Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
