Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
