Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the weight (270g / 9,52oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
