Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
