Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:8) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:8), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
