Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Catana 2500 RC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 2500 RC, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana 2500 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Catana 2500 RC?
Shimano Catana 2500 RC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
