Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind, 20 LW, right hand, Multi Fishing Reel, Star Drag, 1545925
Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €130.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20 LW
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeStar drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT, 2000 S-XH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10308-200
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX offers a total score of 6.63 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables