Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €130.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX and Daiwa TD Match 4012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX offers a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs, while Daiwa TD Match 4012X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa TD Match?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
- At a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.33 out of 10 (500g / 17,64oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
