Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €130.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch and a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Shimano Ultegra?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
