Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €130.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch and a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Shimano Ultegra?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
