Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
