Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX