Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX clearly outshines Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.7 out of 10). While Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
