Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R

Spinning

37.00 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €51.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 SS DH HG
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Spinning

51.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag-

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €32.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Conclusion

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in total score (5.17 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.