Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
