Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
