Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
88.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX
