Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 20X
