Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €677.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
