Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Spinning
47.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 1000 RC, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Catana 1000 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 1000 RC and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Catana 1000 RC
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
