Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €677.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6.3oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X
