Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
