Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9.70oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
