Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
