Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX and Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX stands out for a durability of 5.98 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Penn International VISW?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
