Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
59.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
