Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a weight of 535g / 18,87oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
