Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ
Spinning
64.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sahara FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
