Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.03 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sahara FJ and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
