Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ, C3000HGFJ, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SHC3000HGFJ
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €63.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.44 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sahara FJ and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables