Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
76.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight660g / 23.28oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/240

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
