Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX and Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano 20 Stella?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
