Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.0:1 and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
