Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX
- With a drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle serious pressure from large saltwater predators
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX
