Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
