Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
