Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C3000X and Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C3000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
