Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR

Feeder And Match

79.20 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio4.7

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €125.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC5000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Daiwa TANACOM

Multireels

72.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.72 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio2.1:1

Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs

Weight2040g / 71.96oz

Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €603.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1200
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Conclusion

Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a weight of 250g / 8,82oz, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a durability of 5.72 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa TANACOM?

Shimano AERO XR C5000X

The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios